print-icon
print-icon

Gabbard Showdown: DNI Scrubs "Obliterated" Iran Nuke Line from Testimony, Dodges Imminent Threat Question

Tyler Durden's Photo
by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Mar 18, 2026 - 05:10 PM

Update 1250ET: Things are getting spicy on Capitol Hill - as DNI Tulsi Gabbard faced intense scrutiny from Democrats during a Senate hearing on worldwide threats, while Sen. Markwayne Mullin endured a fiery intra-GOP confrontation during his DHS confirmation, and the SAVE America Act debate dragged into its second day amid Republican divisions.

Gabbard Fireworks

Gabbard, joined by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, FBI Director Kash Patel, and others, testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee on global threats. The session was dominated by fallout from the Iran war and yesterday's resignation of National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent, who protested that Iran posed "no imminent threat" and accused the conflict of Israeli-driven pressure.

Gabbard notably deviated from her prepared written testimony, which included a strong line: Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was "obliterated" by prior 2025 strikes (Operation Midnight Hammer), with "no efforts" to rebuild since, and underground facilities "buried and shuttered with cement." She completely omitted this in her oral delivery, instead stating Iran was "trying to recover from severe damage" to its nuclear infrastructure pre-current operations.

This shift drew immediate fire from Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), who accused her of skipping parts that "contradict the president" on imminent threats and rebuilding claims. Gabbard cited time constraints; Warner pressed on briefing Trump about escalation risks like closing the Strait of Hormuz or Gulf strikes - Gabbard refused to divulge internal conversations, calling aspects of the questioning inappropriate.

Warner: "In your printed testimony: as a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There's been no efforts to try to rebuild their enrichment capability... You omitted that paragraph from your oral opening. Was that because the president said there was an imminent threat?"

Gabbard: "I recognized that time was running long, and I skipped through some of the portions." 

Warner (pressing): "You chose to omit the parts that contradict the president."

Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) repeatedly demanded if Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat; Gabbard refused to affirm, deferring: "It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat... The only person who can determine that is the President." Ossoff called it evasion of DNI duties in a "worldwide threats hearing."

Other tensions included Warner probing domestic intel overreach (Fulton County election office matter) and Russia potentially aiding Iran—Gabbard downplayed and deferred to closed sessions. Sen. Ron Wyden highlighted ignored prior IC warnings on escalation. The hearing amplified intel vs. administration rifts, with no new major blowups but persistent Dem grilling on justification gaps.

Mullin’s DHS Confirmation: Rand Goes Off

As noted earlier, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) testified before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in an 'interview' to become the new DHS Secretary, emphasizing mass deportations, border overhaul, and fixing agency issues amid shutdown chaos post-Kristi Noem's firing.

Drama erupted when Chairman Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) used his opening to blast Mullin's "anger issues" as disqualifying for leading an agency with aggressive tactics controversies. Paul brought up Mullin's past comments concerning a 2017 assault on Paul (broken ribs from neighbor dispute), quoting Mullin calling him a "freaking snake." Paul also brought up a 2023 Teamsters hearing where Mullin (ex-MMA fighter) challenged President Sean O'Brien to a fight ("Stand your butt up").

Paul: "Tell me to my face why you think I deserved it," tying it to trust in setting force limits for ICE/Border Patrol.

Mullin says he doesn't approve of violence, and accused Paul of anti-Republican fights and campaign opposition, and pivoting to qualifications/family/faith (tearful anecdote on Trump's hospital visit to his son).

SAVE America Act: Day 2 of Marathon Debate, GOP Strategy Splits

Senate floor debate continued on the SAVE America Act (proof of citizenship for registration, photo ID for federal voting). Advanced Tuesday 51-48 (Murkowski opposed), it faces filibuster hurdles needing 60 votes. Republicans push extended "talkathon" for messaging/pressure ahead of midterms; Trump calls it top priority. Dems decry suppression; internal GOP tensions over procedural risks vs. passage push.

*  *  *

The U.S. Senate is at the center of a high-stakes political storm today, with multiple critical proceedings converging on Capitol Hill amid chaos over the resignation of counterterrorism boss Joe Kent over the Iran war. Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) faces a confirmation hearing to lead the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testifies on global threats, and the Senate floor continues its second day of extended debate on the controversial SAVE America Act. These events unfold against the backdrop of Operation Epic Fury, the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran, now in its third week - with no clear end in sight.

Gabbard Faces Grilling on Worldwide Threats - and Iran War Dissent

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is appearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee for the annual worldwide threats hearing - and is joined by FBI Director Kash Patel, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and other officials. This marks her most prominent public outing in months and comes amid intense scrutiny over the U.S.-Israel military operation in Iran.

The hearing is dominated by fallout from the resignation of Joe Kent, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center and a close Gabbard aide, who stepped down Tuesday in protest. In a blistering post on X, Kent declared that Iran “posed no imminent threat to our nation” and accused the conflict of being driven by Israeli pressure and flawed intelligence - echoing pre-Iraq War criticisms.

Gabbard responded via her official X account: “After carefully reviewing all the information before him, President Trump concluded that the terrorist Islamist regime in Iran posed an imminent threat and he took action based on that conclusion.” She deferred to Trump’s Commander-in-Chief authority without claiming personal or agency-wide consensus on the threat assessment.

Adding fuel to the drama, Fox News reported (citing a senior administration official) that Kent was a "known leaker" sidelined from briefings months ago, and the White House had urged Gabbard to fire him over suspected leaks - but she did not. Subsequent clarifications from Gabbard's office indicated she was never directly ordered to do so (and would have complied if asked), while other sources disputed that any such request was made. The White House has since stated Gabbard faces no firing risk over the episode.

In the wake of Kent's resignation over Iran, several have pointed out that Kent was 'full send' on 'crushing their ballistic and nuclear capabilities' in 2020.

Lawmakers are expected to probe Gabbard on the intelligence justifying Operation Epic Fury, her own history of anti-interventionist views, internal dissent, and these reported tensions. The conflict, now in its 19th day, has seen U.S. strikes targeting Iranian missile sites, command centers, and proxies, with CENTCOM reporting ongoing progress toward objectives like destroying ballistic missile capabilities and denying nuclear ambitions.

Of note: Tucker Carlson will be interviewing Kent on his show tonight.

Mullin’s Bid to Head DHS: Border Security and Loyalty in the Spotlight

President Donald Trump tapped Sen. Markwayne Mullin earlier this month to replace former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, who was dismissed amid bipartisan criticism of her leadership and amid a partial government shutdown affecting the department. Mullin, a Trump loyalist known for his hardline stance on immigration, testified before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee starting at 9:30 a.m. ET.

In his opening remarks and exchanges, Mullin emphasized his priorities: accelerating mass deportations, strengthening border enforcement, overhauling ICE and FEMA operations, and addressing what he called longstanding agency dysfunction. He positioned himself as the ideal figure to execute the administration’s immigration agenda aggressively.

Drama emerged early when Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) confronted Mullin over for suggesting that Paul deserved to be attached by his nighbor...

...prompting a response from Mullin referencing his family and faith.

"Before I can start my opening statement I have to address the remarks that the chairman made calling me a liar. Sir, I think everybody in this room knows I'm very and direct and to the point. And if I have something to say, I'll say it directly to your face. I said I can understand why your neighbor did what he did. Seems like you fight Republicans more than you work with us."

Democrats pressed with detailed questions on policy implementation during the shutdown, but Republican support appears solid. A committee vote could come as early as Thursday, with full Senate confirmation widely anticipated.

SAVE America Act: GOP Divisions and Filibuster Risks in Marathon Debate

On the Senate floor, debate entered its second full day on the SAVE America Act - which would mandate proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration and requires photo ID to cast ballots in federal elections.

Republicans advanced the bill Tuesday on a narrow 51-48 procedural vote (with Sen. Lisa Murkowski joining Democrats in opposition), but passage requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. Internal GOP tensions persist over strategy: some push for messaging and pressure on Democrats ahead of 2026 midterms, while others worry about procedural pitfalls and limited leverage.

Trump has repeatedly called it his top priority, demanding swift action. Democrats decry it as voter suppression, and the extended debate—potentially lasting days or weeks with late-night sessions—serves as a high-profile political theater amid the broader national security crises.

Stay tuned for updates...

0
Loading...